What Did Jeremy Clarkson Say About Meghan in Ireland?

Clarkson wrote that he “hated [Meghan] on a cellular level” and described how he dreamed of the day “when she is made to parade naked through the streets of every town in Britain while the crowds chant, ‘Shame!’ and throw lumps of excrement at her”. His comments were widely criticised as being misogynistic and discriminatory towards Meghan as a woman.

In a widely criticised move, Jeremy Clarkson, the former Top Gear presenter, used his national newspaper column in The Sun to make a series of shocking remarks about Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex. Clarkson’s comments sparked outrage and backlash across the UK.

Clarkson’s Description of ‘Hatred’ for Meghan

Clarkson did not mince his words, openly expressing his “hatred” of Meghan on a “cellular level”. He suggested that the duchess had used “vivid bedroom promises” to transform her husband, Prince Harry, into a “warrior of woke”. The columnist also claimed that he disliked Meghan more than the notorious serial killer Rose West.

References to Meghan Parading Naked and Having Excrement Thrown at Her

Perhaps the most disturbing part of Clarkson’s column was his description of a dream he had, in which he envisioned the day “when she is made to parade naked through the streets of every town in Britain while the crowds chant ‘shame!’ and throw lumps of excrement at her”.

These graphic and misogynistic comments were widely condemned as promoting hate and discrimination against Meghan.

What Did Jeremy Clarkson Say About Meghan?

The controversial comments made by Jeremy Clarkson about Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, in his column for The Sun newspaper sparked widespread outrage and backlash.

Clarkson’s scathing remarks, which he claimed were “criticisms of her conduct,” were widely condemned as being misogynistic and discriminatory towards Meghan as a woman.

Clarkson’s Column Sparks Outrage and Backlash

Clarkson’s column in The Sun attracted more than 25,000 complaints from members of the public when it was published. The Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso) concluded that, taken collectively, Clarkson’s references to Meghan discriminated against her as a woman.

Ipso Finds Clarkson’s Comments Discriminatory Against Women

Ipso ordered The Sun to publish a front-page statement explaining how its columnist, Jeremy Clarkson, had breached anti-discrimination rules with his comments about Meghan. The regulator’s investigation found that Clarkson’s remarks tipped over into discrimination against Meghan as a woman.

The Sun’s Initial Defence and Ipso’s Ruling

When Jeremy Clarkson’s controversial comments about Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, were published in The Sun, the newspaper initially argued that his remarks were “criticisms of her conduct” rather than attacks on her identity as a woman.

The Sun contended that perceiving any sexism or racism in Clarkson’s column would require “psychic divination” on the part of the reader.

The Sun’s Argument That Clarkson’s Comments Were Criticisms of Conduct

The newspaper maintained that Clarkson’s scathing words about Meghan, in which he expressed his hatred for her on a “cellular level” and described his fantasy of her being forced to “parade naked through the streets of every town in Britain”, were not discriminatory but rather legitimate criticisms of her conduct.

The Sun argued that Clarkson’s column was an exercise of his right to free speech and that readers should not ascribe any sexist or racist undertones to his remarks.

Ipso’s Conclusion That Clarkson’s Remarks Tipped Over Into Discrimination

However, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso), the UK’s press regulator, took a different view. After investigating the more than 25,000 complaints received about Clarkson’s column in The Sun, Ipso concluded that the collective number of attacks on women in the piece had tipped over into discrimination against Meghan Markle as a woman.

Ipso subsequently ordered The Sun to publish a front-page statement acknowledging that Clarkson had breached its anti-discrimination rules.

Reaction and Fallout from Clarkson’s Column

The controversial comments made by Jeremy Clarkson about Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, in his column for The Sun quickly sparked a significant backlash. In response, the Duchess publicly accused Clarkson of writing articles that “spread hate rhetoric, dangerous conspiracy theories and misogyny”.

Meghan Accuses Clarkson of Spreading ‘Hate Rhetoric and Misogyny’

Meghan’s scathing rebuke came as no surprise, as Clarkson’s remarks were widely criticised as being misogynistic and discriminatory towards her as a woman. The Duchess made it clear that she would not tolerate such “hate rhetoric” and “misogyny” being directed towards her.

Backlash from Clarkson’s Daughter and Public Figures

Clarkson’s own daughter, Emily, also distanced herself from her father’s comments, stating that she “stands against everything” he wrote about Meghan. Additionally, the backlash extended to other public figures, who condemned Clarkson’s jeremy clarkson anti-monarchist meghan and clarkson meghan markle insults.

The fallout from Clarkson’s column has had significant implications, with potential impacts on his media contracts and the ongoing debate around why was the grand tour cancelled? press regulation in the UK.

Ipso’s Investigation and Press Regulation Debate

Following the widespread backlash against Jeremy Clarkson’s comments about Meghan Markle, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso) launched an investigation into the controversial column.

With over 25,000 complaints, it became Ipso’s most complained-about article, prompting a detailed inquiry led by complaints from the Fawcett Society and the Wilde Foundation.

Ipso’s Most Complained- About Article and Investigation Process

The Ipso investigation examined whether Clarkson’s remarks breached accuracy, harassment and discrimination rules. Ipso closely scrutinised the content of the column, assessing the collective impact of Clarkson’s repeated attacks on Meghan as a woman.

Their rigorous assessment ultimately concluded that his comments tipped over into discrimination, warranting a formal ruling against The Sun.

Potential Impact on Clarkson’s TV Contracts and Press Regulation Reform

The Ipso ruling and the intense public backlash have raised questions about the potential impact on Clarkson’s media career. With his high-profile television contracts, such as The Grand Tour, now under scrutiny, there are concerns about the future of his broadcasting work.

Moreover, this case has reignited the ongoing debate around press regulation in the UK, with calls for stronger mechanisms to prevent the publication of hateful and discriminatory content.

Ipso’s Investigation and Press Regulation Debate	Description
Background	Following widespread backlash against Jeremy Clarkson’s comments about Meghan Markle, Ipso launched an investigation into the controversial column. This article became Ipso’s most complained-about, prompting a detailed inquiry led by complaints from the Fawcett Society and the Wilde Foundation.
Ipso’s Investigation	The investigation examined whether Clarkson’s remarks breached accuracy, harassment, and discrimination rules. Ipso scrutinized the content of the column, assessing the collective impact of Clarkson’s repeated attacks on Meghan as a woman. Their rigorous assessment concluded that his comments tipped over into discrimination, warranting a formal ruling against The Sun.
Potential Impact	The Ipso ruling and intense public backlash have raised questions about the potential impact on Clarkson’s media career. With high-profile television contracts, such as The Grand Tour, now under scrutiny, concerns arise about the future of his broadcasting work. Moreover, this case reignited the ongoing debate around press regulation in the UK, with calls for stronger mechanisms to prevent the publication of hateful and discriminatory content.

Conclusion

Jeremy Clarkson’s controversial remarks about Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, in his Sun column have undoubtedly sparked widespread outrage and backlash.

The Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso) firmly ruled that Clarkson’s comments were discriminatory towards Meghan as a woman, ordering The Sun to publish a prominent front-page statement addressing the breach of anti-discrimination rules.

The fallout from Clarkson’s column has had significant implications, with potential impacts on his media contracts and the ongoing debate around press regulation in the United Kingdom.

Meghan herself has publicly accused Clarkson of spreading “hate rhetoric, dangerous conspiracy theories and misogyny,” while his own daughter has distanced herself from his remarks, stating she “stands against everything” he wrote about the Duchess.

As the dust settles, this episode has once again highlighted the pressing need for responsible journalism and the careful consideration of the societal impact that high-profile media figures can have.

The continued scrutiny and potential consequences faced by Clarkson serve as a reminder that discriminatory and misogynistic rhetoric, even when couched as criticism, will not be tolerated in the public discourse.

FAQ

What did Jeremy Clarkson say about Meghan Markle?

Jeremy Clarkson, the former Top Gear presenter, sparked outrage with his controversial comments about Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, in his column for The Sun newspaper. Clarkson wrote that he “hated [Meghan] on a cellular level” and described how he dreamed of the day “when she is made to parade naked through the streets of every town in Britain while the crowds chant, ‘Shame!’ and throw lumps of excrement at her”.

What were the reactions to Clarkson’s comments?

Clarkson’s column in The Sun attracted more than 25,000 complaints from members of the public. The Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso) concluded that, taken collectively, Clarkson’s references to Meghan discriminated against her as a woman. Ipso ordered The Sun to publish a front-page statement explaining how its columnist breached anti-discrimination rules.

How did Meghan and her supporters respond to Clarkson’s comments?

In response, the Duchess of Sussex publicly accused Clarkson of writing articles that “spread hate rhetoric, dangerous conspiracy theories and misogyny”. Clarkson’s daughter, Emily, also distanced herself from her father’s comments, saying she “stands against everything” he wrote about Meghan.

What was Ipso’s investigation and ruling on Clarkson’s column?

Ipso launched an investigation into Clarkson’s column after receiving more than 25,000 complaints, making it the regulator’s most complained-about article. The investigation was led by complaints from the Fawcett Society and the Wilde Foundation, which claimed the column breached accuracy, harassment and discrimination rules. Ipso concluded that Clarkson’s remarks were discriminatory towards Meghan as a woman.

How did The Sun initially defend Clarkson’s comments?

Initially, The Sun argued that Clarkson’s comments about Meghan “were criticisms of her conduct” rather than about her identity, and that to see sexism or racism in the column would require “psychic divination” on the part of the reader. However, Ipso concluded that the collective number of attacks on women in Clarkson’s column tipped over into discrimination.

What were the potential impacts of the fallout from Clarkson’s column?

The fallout from Clarkson’s column has had significant implications, with potential impacts on his media contracts and the ongoing debate around press regulation in the UK.